Home » Publication » 24787

Dettaglio pubblicazione


Optimally deceiving a learning leader in stackelberg games (01a Articolo in rivista)

Birmpas G., Gan J., Hollender A., Marmolejo-Cossio F. J., Rajgopal N., Voudouris A. A.

Recent results have shown that algorithms for learning the optimal commitment in a Stackelberg game are susceptible to manipulation by the follower. These learning algorithms operate by querying the best responses of the follower, who consequently can deceive the algorithm by using fake best responses, typically by responding according to fake payoffs that are different from the actual ones. For this strategic behavior to be successful, the main challenge faced by the follower is to pinpoint the fake payoffs that would make the learning algorithm output a commitment that benefits them the most. While this problem has been considered before, the related literature has only focused on a simple setting where the follower can only choose from a finite set of payoff matrices, thus leaving the general version of the problem unanswered. In this paper, we fill this gap by showing that it is always possible for the follower to efficiently compute (near-)optimal fake payoffs, for various scenarios of learning interaction between the leader and the follower. Our results also establish an interesting connection between the follower’s deception and the leader’s maximin utility: through deception, the follower can induce almost any (fake) Stackelberg equilibrium if and only if the leader obtains at least their maximin utility in this equilibrium.
Gruppo di ricerca: Algorithms and Data Science
© Università degli Studi di Roma "La Sapienza" - Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Roma